×
Ad - Ariel: 1000+ cylinder-to-frame combinations
Ad - Ecotec: Methane leak detection from over 300 feet away
Ad - PetroSkills: Oil & Gas Training Courses
Markets & Analytics: CO2 EOR
November 2025 Markets & Analytics

Emerging CO2 Sources Spur Interest In EOR

By Steve Melzer

CO2 enhanced oil recovery has a long track record of success in many North American oil reservoirs, but implementation of new floods has slowed for the past 15 years because horizontal drilling offers faster returns on capital. General inflation and the cost to purchase carbon dioxide have also contributed to the slowdown, but the killer factor for individual EOR projects is almost always the distance between the CO2 source and the field. If they are more than 10 miles apart, building a CO2 pipeline only makes sense for particularly large fields.

Despite these challenges, several signs suggest that CO2 EOR is poised for renewal. To qualify for tax credits and meet the environmental expectations of their investors and customers, industrial plants are increasingly looking at capturing the CO2 they would otherwise emit. Many ethanol plants already do so in order to “clean” and market their primary products.

Today, refineries, coal and cement plants, and existing and new natural gas power generation plants are also considering or investing in emission capture equipment in response to demands from their funding sources to operate more cleanly.

As expanding applications for artificial intelligence drive construction of data centers that demand 24/7 reliable and low-emission electricity, the chance that an oil field has a nearby power plant capturing CO2 should grow. With CO2 sources more abundant, even remote EOR projects that would have once been prohibitively expensive could transform into attractive investments.

Important Changes

The proliferation of CO2 sources is being driven partly by changes to the 45Q tax credit that encourage companies to sequester CO2. In the past, the credit for sequestering CO2 through EOR projects was only $60 a ton, $25 less than the credit for waste disposal storage. But thanks to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, EOR now awards the same credit as the CO2 dumping forms of sequestration.

The tax code change works alongside another factor leading to new CO2 EOR projects: a reset of the default reservoirs used for discarding captured CO2. Historically, plants would usually inject CO2 into nearby deep saline, non-hydrocarbon-bearing formations. These formations’ proximity made them more affordable than transporting CO2 to an oil field.

But with the volume of captured CO2 growing, concern has mounted that too much injection will exceed the capacity of those formations and induce seismicity. Like operators in the Permian Basin who are looking for new ways to use produced water, industrial facilities that would traditionally dispose of carbon dioxide are seeking better outlets for it.

Enter CO2 EOR. History shows that CO2 EOR projects have not led to significant reservoir over-pressurization, meaning they are unlikely to induce seismicity or find vertical pathways to shallower aquifers or the surface. Thus, the default and popular path of injecting CO2 into deep saline formations is no longer the preferred or sole option.

EOR can be an appealing alternative not only for individual companies, but also for society at large. It has the advantage of 50 years of history, during which time the industry has demonstrated that CO2 pipelines and injection wells can operate safely and reliably. It produces oil that has, considering the CO2 stored, very low net carbon emissions. That makes the case for EOR strong even before considering the severance taxes the incremental oil production contributes to state coffers.

Deal Structures

Given the many trends driving stronger interest in CO2 EOR, deals between CO2 sources and producers are moving forward. They generally adopt one of three structures:

  • The capture entity shares a portion of the 45Q tax credit, which now stands at $85 a metric ton, with the injecting company.
  • The capture entity takes the full value of the tax credit but delivers CO2 at a significantly discounted price or even pays to have its CO2 stored.
  • The new project is integrated into an enterprise that spans CO2 capture to transportation to injection, with all parties sharing the tax credit and oil revenues based on their ownership percentages in the enterprise.

The tax credit can be significant. To put it in more familiar terms, $85 a metric ton is about equal to $4.40 an Mcf. For comparison, naturally sourced CO2 generally costs no more than $2.00 an Mcf even when oil is priced near $100.

Expedited Permits

One factor deserving early planning in new EOR projects is injection well permitting. If the sole purpose of a well is to permanently sequester CO2, it is classified as a Class VI injection well.

By law, the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority to approve or deny permits for Class VI wells. However, states can ask EPA to delegate some of its authority by requesting primacy over those wells. As of early October, only Arizona, Wyoming, North Dakota, Louisiana, and West Virginia have succeeded at getting it, though Texas is close to doing so. Primacy matters, because states tend to review permits more quickly than the EPA.

Almost every state has primacy over permitting for Class II wells, the ones used to inject CO2 during EOR projects. The process for permitting these wells tends to be well-known and relatively easy since such a long history has shown their ability to operate safety and protect the environment.

Both Class II and Class VI injection wells require measurement, monitoring and verification plans to assure regulators and the capture entity that the reported volume of CO2 has been securely stored. EPA is directed to review the plans, usually accomplished in an expedited way, and the Department of Treasury uses that reporting system to award the taxpayer credits.

A Valued Conference

With easier access to CO2, larger tax credits encouraging companies to evaluate EOR opportunities, and CO2 emitting companies announcing capture plans, I am seeing increased interest in the CO2 Conference, a yearly event in Midland that covers the financial, legal and practical aspects of carbon capture and storage. This year’s iteration, which will take place Dec. 8-11 at the Bush Convention Center, will continue the conference’s 30-year legacy of sharing case studies and best practices for maximizing CO2 EOR projects’ potential.

This year’s event is set to be particularly exciting. The new funds flowing into CO2 capture and injection are expanding products and services in a way not seen for many years, and operators are applying some of the new techniques to make their EOR projects more efficient. The CO2 business is changing, and this year’s conference will explore the whys and hows.

Steve Melzer

STEVE MELZER is the owner of Melzer Consulting, through which he has spent three decades helping companies understand the mostly private and complex marketplace for carbon dioxide. In the process, he has assisted large independent oil and gas producers, majors and midstream firms, the University of Texas, the U.S. Department of Energy, and nongovernmental nonprofits. Melzer also serves as the co-founder and managing director of the annual CO2 Conference in Midland, a nonprofit event that gathers experts in CO2-based enhanced oil recovery and carbon capture, utilization and storage while raising funds to support scholarship programs for the Society of Petroleum Engineers and the University of Texas at the Permian Basin. Born in Winfield, Ks., Melzer earned a bachelor’s in geological engineering from Texas A&M University, as well as a master’s in rock mechanics from Purdue University.

For other great articles about exploration, drilling, completions and production, subscribe to The American Oil & Gas Reporter and bookmark www.aogr.com.